Who Writes Tickets For Traffic Cameras

Received a Speed Camera Ticket for My Machine, Merely I Wasn't Driving

My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: WASHINGTON

Howdy Washington Land experts! I have been reading with this forum for a while and I hope I have picked upwardly some things that can aid me in this matter, simply I wanted to present my ideas to you, since you lot are the experts and ask for advice from any of you.

At the time of this infraction my son was driving the car. He told me I would exist receiving this ticket, so I have been expecting it.

I know that I tin can sign an affidavit that says that U was not operating the vehicle at the fourth dimension of infraction, but what I don't know is if I should use the ane provided for me, and if I don't apply that one, do I demand to contest the ticket and then produce an affidavit I made myself.
The Affidavit that they provide for me to sign includes a infinite for the proper name of the bodily driver that was operating the vehicle. I don;t want to implicate my son in this, but I'm not certain if I tin get out it blank, or write something similar "I was not Nowadays, thus I am not sure."

From what I have read of RCW, I empathize it to mean that I just need to say I WASN'T driving, not that I know WHO WAS driving. RCW 46.63.075 "if the registered possessor states, nether oath, in a written statement to the court or in testimony earlier the court that the vehicle involved was, at the time, stolen or in the intendance, custody, or control of some person other than the registered owner."

In addition, I read a mail service past someone on this forum a long time ago, that the placement of this speed camera isn't lawful based on RCW 43.63.170. I know that would only come up into play if I decided to competition the ticket with a hearing. My primary question is about the Affidavit matter; if I need to utilise theirs or what I should say in that field.

I take attached pictures of the ticket and the options for it which include paying information technology, signing the affirmation, or scheduling a mitigation or contested hearing.

Thanks in accelerate for your assist guys! I have been reading for a long time and I know you lot volition have thought of something I didn't.

Thank you Again!

Pictures are hosted hither: http://imgur.com/a/EOZyd

Source: https://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=194606

Posted by: nunleyalung1980.blogspot.com

Share this post